Hund's rules, formulated by Friedrich Hund around the year 1925, provide a systematic framework to determine the term symbol that corresponds to the ground state of multi-electron atoms by specifying how electrons occupy degenerate orbitals within a subshell[1]. At the core of these rules lies the principle that the lowest energy configuration maximizes certain quantum numbers related to electron spin and orbital angular momentum.
The first of Hund’s rules states that for a given electron configuration, the term with maximum multiplicity has the lowest energy. Multiplicity is quantitatively expressed as \(2S+1\), where \(S\) represents the total spin angular momentum quantum number for all electrons in the open subshell[1]. The multiplicity is also equal to the number of unpaired electrons plus one. Therefore, the term with lowest energy is also the term with maximum \(S\) and maximum number of unpaired electrons with equal spin angular momentum (either +1/2 or -1/2). This phenomenon aligns with the Pauli exclusion principle, which restricts two electrons in one spatial orbital to having opposite spins (one must be +1/2 and the other −1/2). The orbitals of the subshell are each occupied singly with electrons of parallel spin before double occupation occurs.
Early explanations suggested that placing electrons in separate orbitals increased their average spatial separation, thereby reducing electron–electron repulsion. However, accurate quantum-mechanical calculations (starting in the 1970s) have shown that the reason is that the electrons in singly occupied orbitals are less effectively screened or shielded from the nucleus, so that such orbitals contract and electron–nucleus attraction energy becomes greater in magnitude (or decreases algebraically)[1]. Consequently, maximizing spin multiplicity leads not only to favorable electrostatic repulsion conditions but also enhances stabilization through stronger nuclear attraction.
Silicon's ground state electron configuration is written as:
\[ \mathrm{Si} : 1s^2\,2s^2\,2p^6\,3s^2\,3p^2 \]
Analysis focuses on the two outermost electrons in the \(3p^2\) subshell[1]. According to Hund's first rule, possible terms arising from this configuration include singlet states \(^{1}D\), \(^{1}S\), and a triplet state \(^{3}P\). Here, multiplicity is indicated by the superscript; for example, triplet means multiplicity equals three. The ground state corresponds to term \(^{3}P\), where total spin quantum number satisfies
\[ S = 1 \quad \Rightarrow \quad \text{multiplicity} = 2S+1 = 3. \]
The magnetic quantum numbers along a chosen axis (z-axis), denoted as \(M_L\) for orbital angular momentum and \(M_S\) for spin angular momentum components respectively, can take values such as:
\[ M_L = 1, \quad M_S = 1. \]
This configuration confirms maximal spin alignment consistent with Hund’s first rule[1].
Hund’s second rule refines ground state identification by considering orbital angular momentum quantum number (\(L\)) within terms of equal multiplicity[1]. It states that for a given multiplicity, the term with the largest value of the total orbital angular momentum quantum number \(L\) has the lowest energy. Physically, this relates to classical intuition where if all electrons are orbiting in the same direction (higher orbital angular momentum) they meet less often than if some of them orbit in opposite directions; reduced collision frequency minimizes repulsive potential energy.
For silicon’s case with only one triplet term (\(^{3}P\)), this second rule does not apply because no competition exists between multiple terms of identical multiplicity.
Titanium (atomic number \(Z=22\)) offers a clear example where both rules one and two are necessary. Its electron configuration is:
\[ \mathrm{Ti}: 1s^2\,2s^2\,2p^6\,3s^2\,3p^6\,3d^2\,4s^2. \]
The open shell contains two electrons in the \(3d^2\) subshell[1]. Possible terms include three singlets (\(^{1}S,\ ^{1}D,\ ^{1}G\)) and two triplets (\(^{3}P,\ ^{3}F\)). Applying Hund’s first rule narrows candidates to triplets due to higher multiplicity. Then Hund’s second rule selects among these based on maximum orbital angular momentum:
\[ L=3 \quad (\text{for } ^{3}F), \quad L=1 \quad (\text{for } ^{3}P). \]
Since higher L corresponds to lower energy per rule two, term \(^{3}F\) is favored over \(^{3}P.\)
Notably absent is a triplet G-term (\(^{3}G\)) with total orbital angular momentum component:
\[ M_L = 4,\, M_S = 1. \]
This would require two electrons each occupying orbitals characterized by:
\[ M_L=2,\quad M_S=+1/2, \]
which violates Pauli exclusion because no two electrons can share identical sets of quantum numbers within one system[1].
Hund’s third rule addresses energy shifts due to spin–orbit coupling. In the case where the spin–orbit coupling is weak compared to the residual electrostatic interaction, \(L\) and \(S\) are still good quantum numbers[1].
The total angular momentum operator is defined as:
\[
\boldsymbol{J} = \boldsymbol{L} + \boldsymbol{S}.
\]
For an atom with outermost subshell half-filled or less, the level with the lowest value of the total angular momentum quantum number \(J\) lies lowest in energy. If the outermost shell is more than half-filled, the level with the highest value of \(J\) is lowest in energy.
The splitting is given by:
\[
\Delta E = \xi(L,S)\{\boldsymbol{L} \cdot \boldsymbol{S}\},
\]
where parameter \(\xi(L,S)\) quantifies coupling strength dependent on specific electronic states involved[1].
Hund’s rules provide fundamental guidance for predicting electronic configurations’ ground state terms essential in atomic spectroscopy interpretation and chemical bonding analysis. They clarify why certain multiplet states predominate experimentally observed spectra and explain observed magnetic properties linked directly to unpaired electron spins.
Moreover, Hund’s principles underpin foundational concepts used widely in computational chemistry methods modeling electronic structure and inform understanding of magnetism at atomic scale through direct connection between electron spin arrangements and resulting magnetic moments.
These rules assume that residual electrostatic repulsion dominates over spin-orbit coupling interactions among valence electrons—the so-called LS coupling regime—valid typically for lighter atoms where relativistic effects remain moderate[1]. In heavier elements or ions exhibiting strong spin-orbit effects or jj-coupling schemes instead of LS-coupling dominance, Hund's rules may fail or require modification.
Additionally, closed shells and subshells do not contribute to the quantum numbers for total \(S\) and total \(L\). It can be shown that for full orbitals and suborbitals both the residual electrostatic energy and the spin–orbit interaction can only shift all the energy levels together; thus only the outer valence electrons must be considered when determining the ordering of energy levels[1].
---
Hund's rules remain indispensable tools characterizing complex multi-electron systems’ behavior rooted rigorously in quantum mechanics while maintaining intuitive physical interpretations regarding electron distribution patterns within degenerate atomic orbitals.
Generating summary…